Franco Agamenone vs Thomas Faurel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Agamenone has shown a marginally stronger second serve performance than Faurel, winning 43.67% of points over the last six months compared to Faurel's 41.76%. Does this give Agamenone a slight edge? Yes, in terms of second serves.
• Return Game Stats: In recent form, Agamenone also edges out Faurel slightly in return stats, winning 49.53% of second serve return points compared to Faurel’s 47.6%. On first serve returns, Agamenone's advantage is minimal, with 30.4% against Faurel's 30.29%.
• Under Pressure Analysis: Agamenone has been more efficient at saving breakpoints, with a 50.43% save rate compared to Faurel’s 47.22%. Could Agamenone handle pressure situations better? The stats suggest so.
• Performance Overview: Over the past year, Agamenone and Faurel have nearly identical match win percentages, with Agamenone at 61.64% and Faurel at 61.43%.
• Best Surface: Faurel's best performance comes on clay, with a win rate of 57%, whereas Agamenone excels on hard courts, winning 59%. Would the surface be a pivotal factor? It might, depending on the match conditions.
• Player Level: Faurel has played more matches in lower-tier tournaments with a higher win rate (63.27%) compared to Agamenone, who faced stronger opponents at Challenger level, winning 56.41% of his matches.
• Opponent Quality: Agamenone has faced tougher competition with an average opponent rank of 171.23, whereas Faurel's opponents averaged a rank of 385.71. Does this experience against stronger players favor Agamenone? Likely yes.
• Deciding Set Performance: In matches that require a deciding set, Agamenone holds a significant advantage by winning 64% of such sets, in contrast to Faurel’s 41%.
• Break Point Conversion: Agamenone has been more successful in converting breakpoints, with a rate of 38.06% versus Faurel’s 36.47%.

Editorial Prediction (September 17, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing the recent performance patterns and statistical comparisons between the two players, Agamenone demonstrates a slight advantage in several critical areas. His superior performance under pressure, as seen in breakpoint saves and conversions, suggests resilience and composure essential in tightly contested matches.

Faurel displays prowess on clay surfaces, but unless the match takes place on such, Agamenone’s overall experience against higher-ranked opponents could be a decisive factor. Furthermore, Agamenone's ability to secure points both on serve and return illustrates a more consistent recent performance.

Given these insights, Agamenone appears more likely to emerge as the victor in this upcoming tennis match. His edge in key performance metrics and experience against tougher opponents make him the favored candidate to win.